![]() |
The 10 Commandments
The Ten Commandments are accepted by Judaism, Christianity and Islam as a summary of important rules of behaviour. It would be disturbing if Idle Theory were to contradict any of these commandments. However, the meaning of the Ten Commandments is a matter of interpretation. Any text or speech always requires interpretation. It is in the nature of language to be more poetic than precise. And it is in the nature of words that their sense subtly changes with the passage of time. One immediate difficulty Idle Theory has with the Ten Commandments is that there is no 'God' in Idle Theory in the sense of a supernatural Supreme Being who is separate and apart from his creatures. The 'God' of Idle Theory is the one good of Idle Theory: idle time. The 'God' of Idle Theory is a much more akin to the 'god within', and inseparable from all living creatures. To love this god is to love idleness, and to worship this god is to seek idleness, and to know this god is to dwell in idleness. However, in the Ten Commandments, the 4th Commandment concerning the sabbath makes an explicit division of time into the working week and the non-working (and therefore idle) sabbath. And since the sabbath is 'blessed' and 'hallowed', great value is assigned to the sabbath. And therefore it might be argued that the 4th commandment contains Idle Theory's busy-idle duality, and its valuation of idle above busy. Given this proviso about the nature of 'God', or of the 'One Good', it becomes possible to consider the commandments with a modified conception of God. Idle time is not something that can be seen or touched. It cannot be represented by some image. It can only be experienced.
The price of worshipping anything else has effects which may last for many generations of men. Those who do not seek idleness, or hate idleness, condemn themselves and their children to work.
Indeed, Idle Theory would go further, and say that the ultimate price of failing to seek idleness is death and extinction.
The principal difference with Idle Theory is that only one day in seven is idle in this commandment, while Idle Theory seeks to expand the sabbath to ultimately the entire week.
The division of time into working days and holidays (holy days) may have been to force a distinction between busy and idle time so that the two did not get mixed up together, and people were idle when they should be busy, and vice versa. Also, the division of society into working week and sabbath was a way of measuring social idleness. In busy societies, a week would consist of many days of work, and few idle days. In idle societies, the idle sabbath would occupy most of the week, with one or two busy days making up the rest.
However, there might be placed a much wider meaning on this commandment, in which to "commit adultery" is to adulterate.
To adulterate is to make impure by adding extraneous, improper, or inferior ingredients: adulterate coffee with ground acorns; debase silver with copper; doctor wine with water.
In sexual adultery, a man or woman becomes adulterated and impure. But this is only one case of adulteration. Adulterated food and drink are unwhole (and unwholesome) food and drink. Adulterated money is debased money.
This commandment is the only one which deals with intention.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Author: Chris Davis
First created: March 2004
Last edited: Feb 2005