Wheat
Humans probably never selectively bred grasses to produce larger
ears of seed. Instead it was the natural result of the intensive
predation of grasses by both humans and other animals.
As grasses came under increasing predation, slow reproducing grasses
began to be displaced by faster-reproducing grass. Such grasses put more
energy into reproduction. By producing larger seeds, they gave their
offspring a larger store of energy - to power rapid initial growth of
the seedling plant, giving it a head start. At the same time, producing
more seeds result in more seedlings. And coating the seeds in a tough
outer case would increase their chances of surviving intact in the gut
of a predator. Thus the grasses naturally evolved into progressively
higher-yield wheat.
Probably, grass seeds did not initially need to be ground for the
husk to be removed. This only became necessary when grasses had evolved
such tough cases that most human teeth could not break them open. Those
humans who had powerful enough jaws and teeth continued to eat the seeds.
The rest either shifted to some other food source, or began to use
stones to grind and smash open the seeds.
Conversely, if grasses ceased to be subject to intense predation,
the advantages of fast reproduction vanished, and slower and slower
reproducing grasses would gradually predominate.
The introduction of farms, on which these grasses were intensively
cultivated, may well have ended the natural evolution of grasses
towards higher yields - because on such farms, where all, or nearly all,
the seeds were gathered, fast-reproducing grasses were no more successful
in surviving than slower reproducers. But the human farmers probably
kept the largest seeds, from plants with the largest ears, to sow
the next year. In this way, they selected for the most productive plants.
But the relative isolation of these plant crops meant that they did not
cross-breed with other wild grasses to produce new variants. One single
variety of grass would entirely predominate.
Intensive farming - growing thousands of plants in a small area -
increased the number and
reduced the time it took to gather what would have otherwise been a
widely dispersed population of plants. Also, if other animals could be
kept from consuming these crops, a greater proportion of them would
be available for human consumption.
With abundant fauna in the surrounding habitats, the threat from
animals was probably considerable. Ditches, fences, and hedges probably
served to keep out the larger grazing animals. Walls and moats may have
kept out smaller ones like rats or mice. Nets may have been used to
keep out birds. And of course a variety of predators would have been
kept to ensure that where animals did get in, they were rapidly disposed
of, before they could multiply and infest the crop. Only insects appear
to have posed an almost insuperable threat.
Given such a need to defend against other grazing animals, the first
farms may have been sited on islands in rivers. The river and its
predators (such as crocodiles) not only supplied water to irrigate the
plants as well as nutrient soils, but also provided a natural barrier
to most animals. River deltas, in which such islands are abundant, may
have provided the ideal location. And when farming extended to the
river banks, artificial islands may have been created by digging
waterways that served to both irrigate and defend.
On small ocean islands, it may have been possible for men to exterminate,
probably over a long period,
most animals that posed any threat to their crops. On these islands,
with little influx of new immigrant grazing animals, fences and nets
and guard predators would have become unnecessary.